EV Infra Advisory

For EPCs, CPOs, chartered accountants and consultants

You already have the client. The gap is the appraisal.

Someone asks you whether their site works, what it will cost, and whether a bank will fund it. The first two you can answer. The third needs a financial model, and building one for every enquiry is not what you are paid for. That is the part we do.

Read a full specimen DPR Talk about volume

Three ways to work with us

Refer. Send the client to us. They buy directly, you stay out of the financial opinion entirely, and you keep the equipment or engagement conversation clean.

Buy in volume. You hold a balance of reports and draw on them as enquiries come in, without a separate transaction each time. Useful when screening is a routine part of your pipeline rather than an occasional need.

Co-brand. The report goes out under your name, with your cover and your contact details, generated by our engine. Suited to firms whose clients expect the appraisal to come from them.

Volume and co-branding are arranged case by case rather than sold off a price list — the right structure depends on how many reports you actually need and how quickly. Standard single-report pricing is on the pricing page.

The condition, stated plainly

The verdict is not editable. Not by you, not by us, not for a fee. If the numbers say a project cannot service its debt, the report says so — including in the conclusion, and including when the reader is your customer and the answer costs you a sale.

Every co-branded report carries a line stating that the financial appraisal was generated independently by EV Infra Advisory and cannot be altered by the distributing party. That line is not a disclaimer we hide at the bottom. It is the reason the document is worth anything to the person it is written for, who is a credit officer deciding whether to lend against it.

An appraisal that always says yes has no information in it, and lenders work that out quickly. The value you are reselling is precisely that ours does not.

Why this is worth your while

For an EPC or equipment supplier: the loan is what closes your sale. A proposal that fails at the bank costs you the order, and usually after the client has already spent time and money. Knowing early which enquiries are financeable is worth more than converting a few extra of the ones that are not.

For a CPO: you receive enquiries from landowners and would-be franchisees that you have no economic reason to appraise honestly, and they know it. Handing that question to an independent party is faster than building the capability, and more credible than answering it yourself.

For a chartered accountant or loan consultant: EV charging arrives without a template. The asset lives are unusual, the tariff is a regulated input, and utilisation assumptions are where most proposals quietly fail. You get a defensible third-party model instead of extrapolating from a different industry.

What the report contains

Twenty-two sections in the format a bank expects: project cost, means of finance, projected profitability, cash flow and balance sheet, a month-wise repayment schedule with DSCR by year, break-even, a ten-scenario sensitivity analysis, risk and mitigation, statutory approvals, and security and credit-guarantee treatment. Every figure traces back to a named input through the assumption register at the end.

Read the specimen before deciding anything. It is a real appraisal of an illustrative site, produced by the same engine a paid order runs, and it concludes that the project should not be submitted in its present configuration. We published the failing case on purpose: it shows you what the document does when the answer is inconvenient.

Read the specimen DPR